Friday mid-day realisation
I can see the surface of my desk before I recognize the symptoms. I have time to spare, and I am trying to avoid the thesis. Now that I am aware of what I am doing, it feels relaxing to sort through old papers, cleaning up, throwing out, putting away. And I find interesting things. I even had a copy of an article by Micael Heim. It needs to be read. I will read it. Good decision - now for the bean-bag chair.
Friday, August 30, 2002
Read Anja Rau's comments on my comments August 26th on an article in the NY Times on web economy. Anja says pretty much what I wanted to say, but obviously much clearer and better. Thanks Anja!
( And the permalinks on this unmodified version of a standard blogger template have always worked like this - if one of my html-savy friends want to fix that I'd be delighted to give them the password!)
( And the permalinks on this unmodified version of a standard blogger template have always worked like this - if one of my html-savy friends want to fix that I'd be delighted to give them the password!)
Wednesday, August 28, 2002
The interview with Will Wright in Gamestudies volume 2 is getting quite a bit of traffic. I found an other interview with him though...
Karyn is in debt, but she's very optimistic! It's an interesting comment to the article in New York Times on where the money is online. We have spam, fraud and porn, and now there's honest - but high tech - begging.
Tomorrow I am giving a lecture on research on popular culture. 10 years ago I wrote out every word of every lecture, I was that nervous. They were packed with references, structured almost like articles, but more oral. Sometimes I wrote them in my own dialect, in order not to sound like I was reading from a script. Back then writing a lecture and writing an article was pretty much the same thing, only slightly different audience.
Today I find that I think about the lecture totally differently from an article. At first I wasn't sure if this was bad or good, but they are different beasts, so I have to approach them differently. Where an article demands a stringent argument and low redundancy, a lecture demands repetition and a meandering approach close to non-linearity. Where the article needs a reference every time I make a claim, the lecture needs some important references of book which might be important to the students - the rest should be mentioned, but not emphasised. Where an article has to stand alone out there and contain enough information that it will be understood in the correct context as the correct object by the right people, the lecture lets me explain, ramble, backtrack - and not the least: address the audience. That's one of the things I like to do - turn around and talk with the students, not just past them.
How I prepare for this topic? Well, I guess I have to read a lot of comix, don't I?
No, really - I am most concerned about gathering examples of popular culture to use as examples. It will be fun.
Today I find that I think about the lecture totally differently from an article. At first I wasn't sure if this was bad or good, but they are different beasts, so I have to approach them differently. Where an article demands a stringent argument and low redundancy, a lecture demands repetition and a meandering approach close to non-linearity. Where the article needs a reference every time I make a claim, the lecture needs some important references of book which might be important to the students - the rest should be mentioned, but not emphasised. Where an article has to stand alone out there and contain enough information that it will be understood in the correct context as the correct object by the right people, the lecture lets me explain, ramble, backtrack - and not the least: address the audience. That's one of the things I like to do - turn around and talk with the students, not just past them.
How I prepare for this topic? Well, I guess I have to read a lot of comix, don't I?
No, really - I am most concerned about gathering examples of popular culture to use as examples. It will be fun.
Some links, in Norwegian, about the new research program from the Norwegian board of research. I need to have access to these while I think about new research projects.
notis: KIM
Instillingen fra planutvalget
SKIKT videreføres som KIM
notis: KIM
Instillingen fra planutvalget
SKIKT videreføres som KIM
Tuesday, August 27, 2002
Jenkins and the journalist
Henry Jenkins describes what he would have liked to say at a talk-show in USA. One of the things I don't do when I am in the US is watch television, but I know of the genre: it's brutal even in fairly polite little Norway, it's impossible to complete an argument, and conflict is everything.
I would most likely have reacted like Henry Jenkins, I agree with him, I am impressed with the data he introduces, and I dislike fanatics who can't enter into an interactive argument, only yelling contests. But in the clear light of secondhand hindsight I think there is a real, clear-cut conflict where media panic as expressed by Daphne White is the one side. The other side in that conflict is the fear of facing real social issues. As long as concerned parents complain about computer games, they don't question the quality of public education, the organisation of society, welfare, support to single parents, or any of the many topics which all concern the environment children grow into adults in.
It's a much larger problem that children grow up in a society where the alternative to being in trouble on the street is sitting in front of a computer. When did their choices become limited to this? What happened to teaching the children how to help out in the home, what happened to participation and collective action? When did the parents outsource their responsibility?
Media panics are an expression of helplessness and fear. When something new intrudes this becomes the focus of the terror, the scapegoat. Banning computer games would not reduce violence. A better standard of living, more control over your life and equal opportunities independent of race, class and gender would. But as long as people worry about computer games, there's no need to change any of the real issues. This is why the liberal intellectual who might ask the wrong - or the right - questions needs to be discredited.
Link by way of Gonzalo
Henry Jenkins describes what he would have liked to say at a talk-show in USA. One of the things I don't do when I am in the US is watch television, but I know of the genre: it's brutal even in fairly polite little Norway, it's impossible to complete an argument, and conflict is everything.
I would most likely have reacted like Henry Jenkins, I agree with him, I am impressed with the data he introduces, and I dislike fanatics who can't enter into an interactive argument, only yelling contests. But in the clear light of secondhand hindsight I think there is a real, clear-cut conflict where media panic as expressed by Daphne White is the one side. The other side in that conflict is the fear of facing real social issues. As long as concerned parents complain about computer games, they don't question the quality of public education, the organisation of society, welfare, support to single parents, or any of the many topics which all concern the environment children grow into adults in.
It's a much larger problem that children grow up in a society where the alternative to being in trouble on the street is sitting in front of a computer. When did their choices become limited to this? What happened to teaching the children how to help out in the home, what happened to participation and collective action? When did the parents outsource their responsibility?
Media panics are an expression of helplessness and fear. When something new intrudes this becomes the focus of the terror, the scapegoat. Banning computer games would not reduce violence. A better standard of living, more control over your life and equal opportunities independent of race, class and gender would. But as long as people worry about computer games, there's no need to change any of the real issues. This is why the liberal intellectual who might ask the wrong - or the right - questions needs to be discredited.
Link by way of Gonzalo
Postmodernism, Romanticism and Norwegian Cuisine
Adrian has a comment on August 26th about restaurants in Bergen and postmodernism:
when i first came to bergen in 1998 there simply was not a restaurant that went remotely close to what what i'd have described as postmodern cuisine, the sort of food that anders actually describes. it has all the qualities of the postmodern; a return to the value and significance of the local, of quotation and pastiche, and the loss of the authority of a particular metanarrative (master or national cuisine). today in bergen i know of 3 restaurants that provide food like this, they are all new. change does happen.
What does Anders (aug.22nd) describe? He describes cooking with traditional Norwegian ingredients, but with tastes which can compete with french or italian cuisine. This might be "quotation and pastiche", but it's not a post-modern expression. Quite to the contrary, it's neo-romanticism - note the reference to the Vikings, a favourite of Norwegian romanticisms. The reason why you didn't find post-modern restaurants in Bergen three years ago is that Norway never got over modernism. We still believe in progress - we're just awfully romantic about those nice, old days when living was easy and mussels tasted like mussels after you had picked them with your own hands and to your armpits in water.
Adrian has a comment on August 26th about restaurants in Bergen and postmodernism:
when i first came to bergen in 1998 there simply was not a restaurant that went remotely close to what what i'd have described as postmodern cuisine, the sort of food that anders actually describes. it has all the qualities of the postmodern; a return to the value and significance of the local, of quotation and pastiche, and the loss of the authority of a particular metanarrative (master or national cuisine). today in bergen i know of 3 restaurants that provide food like this, they are all new. change does happen.
What does Anders (aug.22nd) describe? He describes cooking with traditional Norwegian ingredients, but with tastes which can compete with french or italian cuisine. This might be "quotation and pastiche", but it's not a post-modern expression. Quite to the contrary, it's neo-romanticism - note the reference to the Vikings, a favourite of Norwegian romanticisms. The reason why you didn't find post-modern restaurants in Bergen three years ago is that Norway never got over modernism. We still believe in progress - we're just awfully romantic about those nice, old days when living was easy and mussels tasted like mussels after you had picked them with your own hands and to your armpits in water.
Råning
Have you seen them driving around town, parked side by side and talking through open windows in parking-lots or just in the road when the traffic is slow? Have you heard the beat of bass before you heard the engines of their cars, and smelled burned oil and rubber long after they are gone? Have you wondered about the furry dice, the "wonderbaum" (little tree-shaped cardboard pieces smelling of air-freshener), noticed the stripes and flames painted on the cars and wondered why your old Volvo never looked like THAT? If that's the case, you have seen a "råner". Råne is the Norwegian word for male pig - not castrated. It's also a verb: å råne, which means to spend as much time as possible on outfitting your car with things like a huge stereosystem or extra-wide tires, and then drive around and show off. A råner is a person who does what the verb indicates - normally a young man from a industrial-, fishing or farm-background, most common or at least most visible in the countryside.
Some råne-links for those who read Norwegian:
Er du en råner?
Råner-testen
Råning fra A-Å
Rånernes 10 bud
But, ladies and gentlemen: Råning is not restricted to cars!
This week-end I learned of a new phenomenon: styling your computer. This is the nerd version of råning.
First of all: don't buy a ready-made computer. You want to order every little piece of it seperately, and assemble it yourself. You do this by mail-order, because you live far away from the speciality stores you'd like to visit. This often leads to the pieces being outdated by the time the computer is assembled, and you need to order new and better ones. No, to a real råne-nerd this is not a problem, it's the most important aspect of the entire process.
Second: there's no standard cabinet which can fullfill your vision of tasteful design. To amend that a real råne-nerd orders a cabinet which can be polished down to the metal. Then you cut the sides out and replace them with plexi-glass (what's the use of your artfully assembled interior if nobody can see it?) before you put on three layers of coloured laquer and three layers of clear.
Third: Economical or efficient does not exist in your vocabulary. Read english instruction books on coding language before you have learned english, and then start programming as soon as possible - or perhaps earlier than that. However: if your program takes up too much space on your computer, that's not because you have programmed un-economically, but because you need a new processor/hard-disk/memory-chip.
Fourth: the aesthetic value of the computer and the programs on it, as well as the use you put it to, is a lot more important than function. The blinking lights do not have to actually indicate something, the icons on your opening screen do not have to lead to anything useful or important, and there's no reason to make the log-on process itself quick, easy or understandable for other people. After all: this is your personal expression, your project, the only place where you can be yourself.
I fear that the nerd chicks are as unimpressed with the råne-computers as they are with the råne-cars. Råne-nerds are no good when a standard computer breaks down, since a råne-nerd has nothing but contempt for people who don't build their own computers - just like a råne-car is the one you want to flag down - not for help, but if you need a ride to the closest car-shop. The person behind the wheel would be able to style your car beautifully and tell you which polish to use - but is not a problem solver unless you have a really esoteric problem.
Have you seen them driving around town, parked side by side and talking through open windows in parking-lots or just in the road when the traffic is slow? Have you heard the beat of bass before you heard the engines of their cars, and smelled burned oil and rubber long after they are gone? Have you wondered about the furry dice, the "wonderbaum" (little tree-shaped cardboard pieces smelling of air-freshener), noticed the stripes and flames painted on the cars and wondered why your old Volvo never looked like THAT? If that's the case, you have seen a "råner". Råne is the Norwegian word for male pig - not castrated. It's also a verb: å råne, which means to spend as much time as possible on outfitting your car with things like a huge stereosystem or extra-wide tires, and then drive around and show off. A råner is a person who does what the verb indicates - normally a young man from a industrial-, fishing or farm-background, most common or at least most visible in the countryside.
Some råne-links for those who read Norwegian:
Er du en råner?
Råner-testen
Råning fra A-Å
Rånernes 10 bud
But, ladies and gentlemen: Råning is not restricted to cars!
This week-end I learned of a new phenomenon: styling your computer. This is the nerd version of råning.
First of all: don't buy a ready-made computer. You want to order every little piece of it seperately, and assemble it yourself. You do this by mail-order, because you live far away from the speciality stores you'd like to visit. This often leads to the pieces being outdated by the time the computer is assembled, and you need to order new and better ones. No, to a real råne-nerd this is not a problem, it's the most important aspect of the entire process.
Second: there's no standard cabinet which can fullfill your vision of tasteful design. To amend that a real råne-nerd orders a cabinet which can be polished down to the metal. Then you cut the sides out and replace them with plexi-glass (what's the use of your artfully assembled interior if nobody can see it?) before you put on three layers of coloured laquer and three layers of clear.
Third: Economical or efficient does not exist in your vocabulary. Read english instruction books on coding language before you have learned english, and then start programming as soon as possible - or perhaps earlier than that. However: if your program takes up too much space on your computer, that's not because you have programmed un-economically, but because you need a new processor/hard-disk/memory-chip.
Fourth: the aesthetic value of the computer and the programs on it, as well as the use you put it to, is a lot more important than function. The blinking lights do not have to actually indicate something, the icons on your opening screen do not have to lead to anything useful or important, and there's no reason to make the log-on process itself quick, easy or understandable for other people. After all: this is your personal expression, your project, the only place where you can be yourself.
I fear that the nerd chicks are as unimpressed with the råne-computers as they are with the råne-cars. Råne-nerds are no good when a standard computer breaks down, since a råne-nerd has nothing but contempt for people who don't build their own computers - just like a råne-car is the one you want to flag down - not for help, but if you need a ride to the closest car-shop. The person behind the wheel would be able to style your car beautifully and tell you which polish to use - but is not a problem solver unless you have a really esoteric problem.
Monday, August 26, 2002
New York Times about water.
Terje Tvedt, interviewed in the journal of the University of Bergen, Magasinet:
Water is a central factor in the complex political interactions of the Middle East, between India and Bangladesh, in Pakistan as well as in the American West - in fact in most areas of the world. Water plays important roles in both conflicts and cooperation, while dominant perceptions have moved from one extreme to another. At the beginning of the 90s some international organisations declared that future conflicts would centre on water. Nowadays, it is more politically fashionable to claim that water is first and foremost a source of cooperation. We hope that this conference, taking a long-term view of the role of water in history will encourage research and debate in order to demonstrate that such one-sided perceptions are not based on historical experience, and that what is required is more balanced knowledge and understanding.
Terje Tvedt is the author and program director of the documentary television series A journey in the history of water. The conference mentioned in the article was in Bergen 2001. The next conference of the IWHA - International Water History Association - is in Egypt 2003. As water becomes a rare and scarce commodity the historical importance of water becomes increasingly relevant on a global scale, and Terje's research interests almost take on a visionary aspect.
Terje Tvedt, interviewed in the journal of the University of Bergen, Magasinet:
Water is a central factor in the complex political interactions of the Middle East, between India and Bangladesh, in Pakistan as well as in the American West - in fact in most areas of the world. Water plays important roles in both conflicts and cooperation, while dominant perceptions have moved from one extreme to another. At the beginning of the 90s some international organisations declared that future conflicts would centre on water. Nowadays, it is more politically fashionable to claim that water is first and foremost a source of cooperation. We hope that this conference, taking a long-term view of the role of water in history will encourage research and debate in order to demonstrate that such one-sided perceptions are not based on historical experience, and that what is required is more balanced knowledge and understanding.
Terje Tvedt is the author and program director of the documentary television series A journey in the history of water. The conference mentioned in the article was in Bergen 2001. The next conference of the IWHA - International Water History Association - is in Egypt 2003. As water becomes a rare and scarce commodity the historical importance of water becomes increasingly relevant on a global scale, and Terje's research interests almost take on a visionary aspect.
And a quote from slashdot's discussion of spam, fraud and porn on the net:
In some ways, I wish the "cyberspace" notion had never been introduced, because it furthers bad analogies like these, comparing the net to a geographical neighborhood, which has apparently become a red-light district.
That's why I try to avoid using "Cyberspace". Thank you radicalsubversive - whoever you are.
In some ways, I wish the "cyberspace" notion had never been introduced, because it furthers bad analogies like these, comparing the net to a geographical neighborhood, which has apparently become a red-light district.
That's why I try to avoid using "Cyberspace". Thank you radicalsubversive - whoever you are.
The Dirty Net
According to New York Times, the only businesses on the net which makes money at the moment are ebay and amazon - and those involved in porn, fraud and spam. The article makes it sound like the net is sinking with the weight of the "dark side".
Porn and fraud have always been easy ways to money, and it might be correct that apart from the junk, only the really large corporations are able to become profitable. But saying that the net is not profitable is a blind and onesided approach. There is a reason why only a few companies are broadcasting companies, or why the film industry is weak in countries like little Norway. Good communication takes effort, expertice and practice. And in Norway we hardly even have a porn-film industry to practice on.
There are two types of profit off the net.
The one version, which New York Times discuss, is direct: fit a business plan to depend on the net, the way ebay does, launch it and make money. Porn is eminently suited to this approach: It's easy to distribute, it's in high demand, and the net makes it hard to track, discrete and impulsive. Amazon, which sell goods that are somewhat more complicated to distribute, struggles not with the customer side, but with the off-line distribution.
The other version is using the net to make exisiting products more available and let them get more attention. This is where it's hard to measure the impact of the net in money, just as it's hard to measure the impact of a commercial directed towards changing attitudes. But it's also impossible to say that it does not make a difference. Why does NYTimes have a web-rpesence if it does not profit from it in some way or an other? Why does all the other actors - not to mention the research communities? What are the secondary benefits of the World Wide Web?
Link by way of slashdot.org
According to New York Times, the only businesses on the net which makes money at the moment are ebay and amazon - and those involved in porn, fraud and spam. The article makes it sound like the net is sinking with the weight of the "dark side".
Porn and fraud have always been easy ways to money, and it might be correct that apart from the junk, only the really large corporations are able to become profitable. But saying that the net is not profitable is a blind and onesided approach. There is a reason why only a few companies are broadcasting companies, or why the film industry is weak in countries like little Norway. Good communication takes effort, expertice and practice. And in Norway we hardly even have a porn-film industry to practice on.
There are two types of profit off the net.
The one version, which New York Times discuss, is direct: fit a business plan to depend on the net, the way ebay does, launch it and make money. Porn is eminently suited to this approach: It's easy to distribute, it's in high demand, and the net makes it hard to track, discrete and impulsive. Amazon, which sell goods that are somewhat more complicated to distribute, struggles not with the customer side, but with the off-line distribution.
The other version is using the net to make exisiting products more available and let them get more attention. This is where it's hard to measure the impact of the net in money, just as it's hard to measure the impact of a commercial directed towards changing attitudes. But it's also impossible to say that it does not make a difference. Why does NYTimes have a web-rpesence if it does not profit from it in some way or an other? Why does all the other actors - not to mention the research communities? What are the secondary benefits of the World Wide Web?
Link by way of slashdot.org
Friday, August 23, 2002
Check out the responsive animated characters project at NYU. Link by way of slasdot.org where the interview with Will Wright from Game Studies is mentioned under topic:games.
Anders knows how to find the good life in Norway, at his family's summer house. This week-end my family and I (and quite a few friends) are off to my mother's summer house. I won't be hunting mussels there, too many farms around the bay where we have our vacation paradise: a high threshold at the entrance to the fjord, and lots of fertiliser for algae from the farms... you want to watch your shellfish there.
But if I am lucky this week-end, you'll get a description of Norwegian fishcakes that might restore some of the faith in Norwegian cooking. I am off to the private paradise of my family, and I can't wait to go. The weather is lovely here, I haven't spent time in the boathouse all summer, haven't woken up in the really early hours and seen the otters sneak off with the remains of our fish dinners, haven't watched the seals stare at us from the water, haven't watched the porpoises hunt schools of hering, haven't studied the flight of the seagulls to see where the hering surfaces - always good fishing around the migrating silver of the sea - haven't listened to the water as I wake up in the dead of night, haven't.... in short, I am going to have a great week-end doing a lot of stuff which always makes me say what my father used to say: "Us poor people, we have the good life!"
But if I am lucky this week-end, you'll get a description of Norwegian fishcakes that might restore some of the faith in Norwegian cooking. I am off to the private paradise of my family, and I can't wait to go. The weather is lovely here, I haven't spent time in the boathouse all summer, haven't woken up in the really early hours and seen the otters sneak off with the remains of our fish dinners, haven't watched the seals stare at us from the water, haven't watched the porpoises hunt schools of hering, haven't studied the flight of the seagulls to see where the hering surfaces - always good fishing around the migrating silver of the sea - haven't listened to the water as I wake up in the dead of night, haven't.... in short, I am going to have a great week-end doing a lot of stuff which always makes me say what my father used to say: "Us poor people, we have the good life!"
Wednesday, August 21, 2002
To Lars and Jill: This site tops google both if you search for Torill and for "thinking with my fingers" (I know, that's a phrase...). For Mortensen I came in second, but I don't feel that is a defeat. The one person before me at google was the actor Viggo Mortensen. It's only polite to yield the top spot to Aragorn son of Arathorn, King of men.
Monday, August 19, 2002
There are two people in my life I have shared a room with for more than 6 months at a time and enjoyed it. One is my husband. The other is the girl I shared a room with at Skjeberg Folkehøyskole, Heidi Eng. We split up 21 years ago, but this week-end she came back into my life and was her old exuberant, emotional, honest and enthusiastic self. It felt like those 21 years had been a vacation, a short time apart in which we both have experienced a lot of exiting things we can share, and now life has settled back into the normal routine of sharing space, time, knowledge, friends, make-up and the stash of snacks in the closet.
Norwegian research has shown that using cell-phones for messages does not ruin the Norwegian language. An article in the Norwegian Newspaper Dagbladet quotes researcher Kjell Atle Halvorsen at the Norwegian University of Technology in Trondheim, who's been involved in a case study of school-children between 13-16, which is supposed to be the group most dependent on Smart Messaging System - SMS. In conjunction with the research of Berit Skog at NTNU, who leads a project called Mobil Youth Culture, it's now official that cellphones help teen-agers to manage their social life better, they develop language and are more concious of genres, they don't take the SMS-language into the writing they do for school, and only 10% use it to cheat at tests.
Sounds like technology isn't so dangerous after all.
Sounds like technology isn't so dangerous after all.
Saturday, August 17, 2002
The importance of being Turok
first question: Would you change your name to that of a dinosaur hunting video-game character?
I think there are a lot of young men out there who'd think it is a cool idea, and who'd not worry about annoying (or perhaps enjoy annoying) their surroundings by legally changing their name for a year as long as they get a game-consoll, all the games they like and some cash. Wearing a nick-name which indicates some fantastic identity is second nature to that group of people anyway, and so why not be a dinosaur-hunter just as well as your average Joe.
second question: Would you trust your product's reputation to the kind of people who would be willing to do this?
A person who'd be willing to change their name in order to advertise a product might be of the early user, if not the innovator group: risk-takers, active sekers for information or innovation. People in this group are often considered opinion leaders, because they test out things in advance and the people around them know that. I expect this to be the logic which makes Acclaim UK plan for Identity Marketing. They expect the users to be people to be looked up to, people who are admired and trusted, and rolemodels for others.
The flaw in this logic lies just there. If you are a role-model, secure in your social network, known, respected and one who helps form opinions, it also means that you alread are a strongly profiled individual. Your identity is not something you want to flee from, it's something which brings you status and recognition. It's worth much more than a few games and some cash - it's more rewarding to you than the fiction of being a fantasy character: you get your rewards from being yourself.
The people who do not enjoy being themselves are normally insecure, have low self-esteem, have low status and a weak network. They do not overlap with the opinion leaders of diffusion theory.
But hey, they do get attention - just look at me, I am already writing about them!
first question: Would you change your name to that of a dinosaur hunting video-game character?
I think there are a lot of young men out there who'd think it is a cool idea, and who'd not worry about annoying (or perhaps enjoy annoying) their surroundings by legally changing their name for a year as long as they get a game-consoll, all the games they like and some cash. Wearing a nick-name which indicates some fantastic identity is second nature to that group of people anyway, and so why not be a dinosaur-hunter just as well as your average Joe.
second question: Would you trust your product's reputation to the kind of people who would be willing to do this?
A person who'd be willing to change their name in order to advertise a product might be of the early user, if not the innovator group: risk-takers, active sekers for information or innovation. People in this group are often considered opinion leaders, because they test out things in advance and the people around them know that. I expect this to be the logic which makes Acclaim UK plan for Identity Marketing. They expect the users to be people to be looked up to, people who are admired and trusted, and rolemodels for others.
The flaw in this logic lies just there. If you are a role-model, secure in your social network, known, respected and one who helps form opinions, it also means that you alread are a strongly profiled individual. Your identity is not something you want to flee from, it's something which brings you status and recognition. It's worth much more than a few games and some cash - it's more rewarding to you than the fiction of being a fantasy character: you get your rewards from being yourself.
The people who do not enjoy being themselves are normally insecure, have low self-esteem, have low status and a weak network. They do not overlap with the opinion leaders of diffusion theory.
But hey, they do get attention - just look at me, I am already writing about them!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
