Monday, January 31, 2005
It looks like I can finally start to find literature which merges my pleasures with my duties!
Thanks for the link, Jan Fredrik.
Sunday, January 30, 2005
Friday, January 28, 2005
This is why blogs are so seductive: they are free content. And content is the flypaper of the media: you, the audience receive content, we, the organisastion, receive audience, they, the advertisers, have money - we sell the audience for money and the content for money. Only problem in this fantastic money-making machine is that the audience gets choosy, and want more, different, personally relevant content. This pushes the prices of the content up, as it has to be thrilling, gripping, fantastic, to hold as large audiences as possible.
OR the content can be simple, perhaps even free, in which case the quality isn't so important as long as it reaches somebody!
This is where the blogs come in. I am not saying blogs are lousy, I am not really aiming for my own foot. But they are of very warying quality. When selling ads connected to them, that doesn't matter though, because producing a blog is not costing anybody money - or, the costs are so widely spread all over a number of individuals, their employers and certain institutions that the production costs all of these agents insignificant amounts.
Which means: free content = free audiences. Of course somebody must try to tap into this goldmine!
Anjo Anjewierden points to one way of doing this, as a trackback to one of his posts leads to a google ad. The paid-to-promote bloggers show another way of making money off it. This way is at one level more fair, as the bloggers who do the content production actually gets paid for it. Other areas like Friendster and Orkut create communities and insist on having copyright on the writing stored within their password protected walls: write free for them and lose the right to your own writing. It may not always matter, as who cares about the value of saying "hi" to somebody you might like to get to know better, but watch those poems!
It isn't just the referral power of blogs these different agents try to harness, but also the production power of the writers. This may be the next big battle: the right to not make money for others by way of ads, promotion and referrals.
Thursday, January 27, 2005
Wednesday, January 26, 2005
I thought there was a word for this, called "webcast". I am a little at loss as to what makes this a video blog. But it seems like Always On have decided that all they do is blogging:
The mission was to borrow on the underground blogging tradition and produce online services, live events and a magazine that encouraged direct collaboration between global thought leaders and technology industry insiders whose ideas and innovations are shaping the always-on world. Since AO’s inception insiders like Michael Powell, Tim Draper, Jonathan Schwartz and hundreds of other AO members have taken advantage of this open environment to post their ideas and meet like-minded technology insiders from all over the planet.
No other media brand currently allows the level of openness and collaboration between its members. David Kirkpatrick of Fortune predicted the same month we launched our network in February of 2003, “AlwaysOn will define an entire new approach to technologized media.”
Plenty of interesting statements here. First "The underground tradition of blogging." Is this underground? Is there a tradition? You mean I have been working traditional underground blogging style all these years, and never knew! Wonder how the college feels about that - I mean, Academia is pretty alternative at time, but underground it isn't!
Then there's the concept "blogozine":
AlwaysOn (along with its members) will launch a new magazine—making it the first "blogozine" to hit the market...or whatever you want to call it.
But it turns out that since Always On think they are blogging, a magazine that thinks it's blogging has to be a blogozine. And the reason for this new, amazing, wondrous, revolutionary, open source, underground (add words with positive connotations for new media literate readers here) blogozine is pretty much the same as the reason for the promotional blogging we have discussed before.
The “referral power” of the blogosphere is also exploding. Even though the top blog site, Slashdot.org, is viewed by only 350,000 unique viewers a month versus the top media site, NewYorkTimes.com (which attracts 7 million unique viewers), the Times nets only twice as many “inbound links” as Slashdot. PR professionals and corporate marketing executives must now acknowledge this growing alternative media force, and have a strategy to deal with it.
While the development of sites such as Always On, who basically use the word "blog" to mean "the cool stuff that gets a lot of press and which will make people nod impressed when we use it for our business idea", makes me sad, in a way it is also very clear, honest and upfront about their activity. Something as powerful as the referral power of individuals can not go unexploited, we understand that. And this is open about it: we know which site we are on, we know they want to have and make an impact, and their are clear about their reason for creating this -zine. That is very different from the promotion of products in individual blogs.
Still, it makes me wonder: at what point will the word "blog" lose all meaning, and end up at the churchyard of over-abused concepts?
Tuesday, January 25, 2005
Did somebody forget to tell the Russian trawlers that the cold war is over? A few nights ago this boat dropped off a passenger at the marina just below the house. The event looked like something out of a movie, it was oddly quiet and efficient and over in few minutes - boat disappearing into the mist.
Of course, the student was right, but the mood of a tired class tipped towards a touch of exaggeration and it soon developed a certain wicked glee as we expanded on the adolation of technology and entrance to paradise through wireless communication.
However, checking the smart mobs blog, I had a moment of deja vú as I read a presentation of an article by Christine Rosen in the new Atlantis. Her article is full of words resonating negativity: Egocasting, Pod people, The Shallow Critique, ending with Control Freaks (I guess that's us), and is - to say the least, critical to the development of personal communication technology.
What caught me was the quote presented in the Smart Mobs blog:
We talk about our technologies in a way (and grant to them the power over our imagination) that used to be reserved for art and religion. TiVo is God’s machine, the iPod plays our own personal symphonies, and each device brings with it its own series of individualized rituals.
And although Rosen goes on the claim that this isn't religion, but fetishism - well, where did the concept "fetish" come from?
And so I cling, obsessively, to the cellphone, as it controls my day. Beeping, it reminds me that I now need to hurry and get lunch if I want food before the next meeting. Time to let go of the juju which lets me control the supernatural posting power.
Sunday, January 23, 2005
Friday, January 21, 2005
And if you look at his webpage, you'll see he is a visionary young man with ambitions, who plans to keep working at Institute of Media and Communication in Oslo into the next milennium...
[Oh no! he found and fixed the typo!]
In Volda, if you want to stick to your academic ghetto, your options are way too limited. Well, there are a few doctors from the hospital who have as much education as you, and some high school teachers. But if you try to stay within such circles you run out of topics of conversation as with everybody else after 10 years of close living.
That's when you discover the delight of people who have very different lives. Hairdressers, carpenters, engineers, gardeners, electricians - should their work mean I can't understand and even share their dreams and desires, their problems and pleasures? And sometimes you recognize your own trembling fear in their stories and experiences, or share their wild elation when something works. Yes, we are scholars, people comitted to intellectual pursuits, but we are also flesh and bone and breath and love and hate and hunger, and we like to keep it that way - like everybody else.
And today I had my forceful reminder from a story in the larger local newspaper. Two fishermen were saved as their sjark went down. According to the story they were pulling traps. One was stuck, and as it came loose the boat rebounded, then tipped back - and just continued leaning to that side. The guys got into their survival suits, released the safety raft, got into it - and saw their boat sink. The whole thing took about 5 minutes.
There are several points in this story that touches me. First: that people still fish in the fjords from such boats. I used to go out into the ocean with my father in an even smaller one, fishing for cod around this time, when I was a kid. Later, after he had a stroke, we'd take the boat out in summer nights, fishing for salmon - leave in the afternoon, move slowly among the most beautiful mountains you'll ever see, nap in turns, sleep in the boat at some hidden harbour, then return home just in time for me to get to school. The sound of a Saab diesel engine in silent summer nights is the sound of home - true home - moving sedately through the blue light of a Scandinavian summer, alone at the wheel while my father sleeps, with porpoises and eagles as my only company.
And then, the terror. The intense fear of what you know can happen, will happen if you do something stupid, something wrong, something unlucky. The wet wool of my father's sweater as he is pulled back into the boat by his companion, almost tipping over as the nets caught and tried to pull him under. Storms and water sloshing above the boards of the boat, and the sound of a struggling engine. Freezing cold, rain in your face, and the tiny nutshell of a rowing boat, rescuing nets too valuable and too vital for the family to lose. I have protected my children so well from such terror. Looking at the men smiling, thanking the ferry crew that picked them up, I wonder if I somehow have protected them from life.
Because there is that too. Life, relief, delight. To be safe and warm, to have food, to have worked for what is on your table. To sit down and think, consider: is this really worth it - is the struggle, the danger, the risk, really worth what I get back? And the options are so clear: risk, and live, stay safe, and see your life slowly lose taste and warmth. The fishermen just saved answered the question "what now" in typical fashion. "We'll have to think a little before we get a new boat." Scholars know about thinking. Very few of us, however, know about thinking thoughts that may save our lives. Even in medical research such thoughts are rare.
Perhaps Anders Johansen is right, and we don't have much in common with the plumber next door. Perhaps that's our loss.
Thursday, January 20, 2005
I can't go anywhere that week - tied hands and feet by comittments to the college - so go, listen, and write about it! (Preferably in a Scandinavian language, English or German, please?)
Wednesday, January 19, 2005
This is interesting and clever advertising, and Benetton has of course thought about it before. I could not find pictures of the naked Luciano Benetton begging people to bring clothes back to his stores, but I did find pictures from some of their other campaigns.
Norwegians love to learn what other people know about Norway, and so a scholar like Hylland Eriksen becomes very popular with his descriptions of outrageous lack of knowledge about this country abroad. Norwegians kill whales, get very drunk, all the food taste the same and we are not very knowledgeable about non-norwegian cultures. Eriksen has made it his project to show Norwegians Norway from the outside.
I am not sure if he succeeds though. Norwegians love to laugh at our own weirdness - to be misunderstood is an object of pride! And of course, everybody misunderstands Norwegians. So Hylland Eriksen, in his sharp criticism, ends up confirming what all Norwegians know already: the rest of the world just don't get it.
Me as Norwegian as the rest, proud that we are so special the rest of the world can't understand the in-joke of Norwegianness? Only after a lot of booze and a good whale-steak.
Monday, January 17, 2005
Sunday, January 16, 2005
Sunday started late, so I took the time to make something different for breakfast. And it was quicker, really, than the waffles I normally stand around baking when I want to give the family a treat. I made these muffins with chopped dried apricot, which 75% of the family likes. The remaining 25% declared that "this stuff in the muffins just isn't me" and picked the pieces out before demolishing the crumbs. I adjusted the original recipe to fit my diet and what was in my cabinet, and this result was quite nicely edible:
January apricot muffins
2 1/4 cups mixed spelt flour, fine and whole grain
1 1/4 cup milk
1/4 cup sugar substitute (something where the substitution rate is 1:1)
3 eggs, beaten
1 Tablespoon baking powder
1 Tablespoon sunflower seed oil
1 pinch seasalt
1/2 cup chopped dried apricots
1/2 cup ground almonds
Mix all dry ingredients. Add milk, eggs, oil. Mix. Fill muffin
cups, greased or papered. Bake for about 17 minutes, or until browned,
in a 375 degree oven.
I got enough batter for 12 fairly large paper muffin cups. The muffins really stuck to the cups while warm - somewhat easier to get them out when cold. And they had to bake for longer than 17 minutes.
Then I ate them with cream cheese and tea, and had enough energy to get off my ass and out for a walk.
I never used to be all that paranoid about Windows. I had learned how to use it, and while I like the apple design, I resented the way apple packed everything into one deal, no options unless there were special apple versions.
And then Microsoft goes out and does this. MS Works. All the repressed MS paranoia screams to the surface. I want to be able to choose what program to use for what, thank you. I want to go straight from the start menu to the windows- or any other type application I want. I don't want Microsoft to tell me how to do well at school, how to buy a house, how to remember my groceries.
I have to start looking into options.
Friday, January 14, 2005
Link by way of dagbladet weblogg
What they mean is
Here's how it works:
When you put a sign on the freeway people will read it until someone takes it down.
Depending on its size, content and placement it can be seen by hundreds of thousands of people.
So you write your message on a large piece of cardboard, and put it up on the road.
This is, obviously, not blogging as we know it. If they had then put in the requirement: "take a picture of the sign and post it on this blog" we could talk about freeway blogging. But the fact that they call it blogging without any kind of online publishing except for the initial initiative is interesting, as this indicates that the word "blogging" is about to change meaning dramatically.
From "posting online in a public journal," it changes into: "Writing a statement and make it visible and available to a large group of strangers." I can see how this drift can happen. Over the last year the focus on blogging in US media has highlighted the free expression, the political statement and the random viewers. The discussion has been less focused on the meaning of blogging to the online culture, and more on the effect of blogging as a political tool and an open, free channel.
And so putting up a poster on a freeway may become blogging. Not the way I would have used this word, but definitely an interesting twist.
That is, when I try to play action games. I had to use a walk-through to figure out how to get through the tutorial of Max Payne. I am making my own little cards for the key bombinations and what the different concepts mean. Did you know about the shoot-dodge and bullet-time? Well, I didn't, and I had to write down how to do it and why it's smart and now I have to practice it in order to be able to use it.
What I am feeling on the body is that playing action games is a very physical activity. While it's not exactly athletic, I have to teach myself new ways to react and rehearse certain motions until they are second nature. I foresee much dying for my poor Max and much reloading for me in the future. I also foresee me getting a regular mouse or some other input device than a touchpad for the laptop.
Where I am not half bad is at Civilisation. Of course, I am not playing at the divine level or have started fiddling all parameters in order to get a real challenge, but I have happier labourers than my son! But he eradicates all the opposition. He wins because he is agressive, I win because the other states lose when they attack, and their labourers revolt and attach themselves to my loving, caring nation. I am a very nice despot.
Playing these games feels good, it brings back something I feared I had lost for a while there in the stress of academic achievement: the fun of playing. This was so much fun that I will pick up more games, and swap between dying in Max Payne's body, dominating the world in the shape of irresistible Cleopatra or being online in the body of some self-created avatar in what ever becomes the next game I pick up. It will be a multi-player game with 3D graphics and a audio chat channel though. That will be like breaking a barrier for me: talking, not with my fingers but with my mouth, while playing. I want to do it. And once I know how it works, I am just bursting with curiosity and an urge to explore. Strange lands.
Thursday, January 13, 2005
I still don't have a hit-counter, so this is the only indication I have (except from the occasional comment and link) that people actually read my blog. But at the same time, since it's a limited group who use feedburner, I get a very limited readership. I have between 15 and 25 readers, more Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday, less in the rest of the week and the week-ends. This is a perfect number. It's enough that it explains why, when I go to conferences, there's always somebody who says: Oh, but I read your blog! At the same time it is so small it is not intimidating. And with a little bit of not-using-my-knowledge-of-statistical-errors, I can imagine that this pretty diagram, a recent feedburner feature, represents those 2-3 people I meet out there, and a few friends and students.
The diagram is fairly new, and it keeps becoming increasingly complex. The "others" section has split into several smaller slices, and today NewsNetWire is much larger than Bloglines. It only takes a couple of readers to tip that though, as you can see. While the diagram in itself isn't all that fascinating, what hooks me is that I get to see the work of the developers of feedburner as it develops. First no diagram, then a simple one, now a complex one - somebody are working out there. I love it.
Wednesday, January 12, 2005
No gadgets, but something I will be very happy about this year, I think (there are two more storms looming over Scotland just waiting to hit this coast). I adore the fashion with colourful boots, I have wanted something other than military green or slick black since I had a pair of red boots as a kid. I wore those boots all the time, rain or shine, and they were even better after I happened to chop a hole in one of them with an axe (yes, the foot was inside but unharmed) and they were repaired with a nice, bright patch!
The red ones I really wanted were too expensive though - as I am still planning gadget shopping.
And yes, my son has already informed me that bright boots are so popular they are over the top. I don't care. I am just regretting I am so conservative I didn't go for the white, yellow and orange daisies.
Tuesday, January 11, 2005
In Norwegian we say we become "værsjuk" - literally: Sick of the weather. Whether or not we actually get sick of the lack of light is still up for discussion. After all: a large chunk of Norway does not have sunlight at all in large parts of the year, and if it is a normal reaction to sleep more, become less physically and mentally active and to need more social reinforcement under such conditions, that does not mean half of the Norwegian population should be medicated. There are things to do, like going out despite the bad weather, use what little daylight there is, and be physically as well as socially active. Which is, probably, the reason amateur choirs, bands, dancing groups and just about any other social indoor activity you can think of flourishes in Norway during the winter months.
But sometimes it's just too much. I was listening to the storm tonight, third named storm in two weeks (they only name them when it gets serious, the kind of "don't go out unless you have to evacuate your building" type storm). Mornings like today I understand the motivation of writers such as Olav Duun, Amalie Skram and August Strindberg or more recent Scandinavian social-realistic and pretty depressive writer Jon Fosse.
These are writers I do not wish to understand. I have no desire to understand about guilt, gloom, obsession with self, the slowly developing contempt and hatred of others developing from too close familiarity, desperation born of unchangeable circumstances and tragedies rising from being trapped in the same small community, same tracks, same rooms month after month after month.
And after this happy little rant I started writing about the options: of how Scandinavians go to sunny paradises abroad in order to get a shot of warmth and light and get back on the feet. Not a good thought this winter. Sometimes sleeping 12 hours a day and spending the "days" trying to function while the brain is always on the low gear is the good option.
Monday, January 10, 2005
I don't know how legitimate the different claims are. The blog does not post much research into the individual cases of "blogophobia", but the phenomenon is interesting. The "bloggers' right" blog is an attempt to use a blog as a weapon to force the companies in question to treat bloggers differently. And it may work, because blogs are powerful - which is, of course, why companies are so sensitive to what people blog about them. Some of this worry is justified, as not every individual blogger is perfectly discreet and keep their different roles straight. It's a learning project, we are all learning how to interact online, how to use the new media and developing manners and norms for civilized online behaviour. And angry bloggers testing out their strength versus the companies that fire bloggers is part of this development.
Sunday, January 09, 2005
I lived for a year in the flat landscapes of Østfold, the Norwegian grain district. While others love that landscape, I felt closed in and as if there was no sky. Here, where everything is limited and framed by mountains, where the sky is what we can see once we have climbed to the peak, I feel I have space to breathe and a sky to watch. In a way the limits makes it more clear, more powerful.
I know the continuous storms which have been raging with varying strength for the last few weeks has made light rare. Over a wet, dark ground and the looming mountains the sky offers quick glimpses of a thinner cover of clouds, and it becomes precious.
Saturday, January 08, 2005
To me, the idea of getting paid for what I write here is of course tempting - I would love to be able to live from it. But I have worked as a journalist, I have lived under editorial restraint and I have written in order to make certain the paper has enough readers to attract enough advertisers to make the budget balance. It's not what I do. If I wanted to satisfy advertisers, I could have a job in a women's magazine or a big news paper. I chose differently.
Making money from your blog changes the model you work within. Getting paid to blog changes the blog. It isn't personal publication any more, your blog has become a one-person business.
I think there is a difference between the practice of Christopher Allbritton, who went to Iraq sponsored by his readers, several individuals paying an individual, and Elizabeth Lane Lawley blogging about a certain product each week in order to get paid. Allbritton was paid to write more of what he already did and from a better vantage point, Lawley is paid to write one particular thing once a week, adding a link and thus manipulating google rank.
A significant part of Lawley's trustworthyness comes from her position as a scholar, an academic. It is what has made her blog important in the development of blogging, and what has given her a considerable part of her recognition. Yes, she is brilliant, but she is also positioned within a system which supposedly is not commercialised and thus should be independent of other interests but the public good. Although it may not be, what do I know - there are horrible stories about sponsored colleges reaching the protected, public educational system of Norway. Still: it is her status as a scholarly blogger which will sell a product.
Paid research is already a problem in Academia - reports being altered, held back or buried if they do not please the parties paying for the research. We know it happens, no matter how the idea makes individual scholars shudder and mutter: "but my path is clean." Now we get promotional academic blogging. Fun.
Friday, January 07, 2005
I don't know how the minds of all researchers work, but creating definitions with the sole purpose of recieving credit for them is pointless. Definitions are crucial to research, not because you can get recognition, but because definitions are the prerequisite for talking about a concept. If I can't define what a blog is, I can't discuss it, because I can't distinguish it from other forms of communication. Following that, the idea of keeping a definition as open as possible is a bad idea. While a very open definition where a blog or a videoblog can be almost anything might be 100% correct, it'll also be 100% useless.
First I want to address this comment.
Some wide definitions work quite nicely, and lets us discuss objects of research as more than a narrow category. Take the semiotic understanding of "text". It permits just about everything which is created with the purpose of sending some kind of signal to be interpreted as a text. This positions the object of perception as a cultural artifact, and lets it be interpreted according to the context in which it is perceived. It is an extremely wide definition, as it encompasses almost everything made by humans, and according to the logic of Pedersen it should be almost useless. But it isn't, quite contrary.
Sometimes, in order to discuss a phenomenon, we need to delay the process of narrowing it down. If I am to find out what a blog IS, I can't just look at the blogs that adhere to journalistic standards, academic blogs, disaster blogs, travel blogs, personal diary blogs, photo blogs, moblogs, voice blogs, video blogs or what ever. I can't understand the BLOG from either of these narrow categories. I can however learn something about a certain type of blogs, if I make it clear that my study is only about this.
But what made me react originally was not really the idea of a definition, although definitions and manifestos are related.
If there is a bloggers manifesto, declaring what a blog should be, and this is so narrow that any of the above - and several unmentioned - types of blog does not fit, then the manifesto is reducive, and changes a phenomenon that already exists within its own boundaries. It's not a definition (which a manifesto is not, anyway), but a statement of the writer's intent for what blogs ought to be. A definition is descriptive: "This is what I understand this object to be." A manifesto is normative: "This is what this object should be."
When Adrian Miles wrote the vog manifesto, the vogma, he was quite alone with the term. As others found it and realised "hey, this is what I am doing", the term became established and took hold, and the vog developed from Adrian's intent. The blog has some technical features and some intent such as "push-button publishing for the people" - a slogan, but also a type of manifesto. But there were no original rules limiting a blog in for instance genre, content, ethics or graphic expression in that early phase, and the blog developed until it had reached millions of users (and budded into for instance vogs) before the desire for a manifesto or even a definition arose.
The vog was created through the vogma, the blog risks to be reduced by a "blogma". These are two very different situations.
As stated before, I am not all that concerned by such a reduction (if it does take place, that is not a given), as I expect the practice will just find other channels - or not change at all. A reduction will however be a loss to research, as it means a lot of ways to use a blog can be lost to the scholarly eye. I am old enough to remember when comics and paperbacks were not literature, and to know what a struggle it was to put popular media into the Universities. I don't want to participate in creating an academic exclusiveness that excludes the weight-bloggers for instance. Definitions need to exist at several levels, as they have to describe what already exists. Manifestos can be narrow and restrictive, because they describe what we want to see come into being.
But who knows what will come of a bloggers manifesto anyway? Some brilliant mind could do both: contain everything that blogs are at the moment, and point towards some bright and beautiful future. I would love that!
I have been spreading copies of the article to the students, and hopefully it will make them see that they are working on two really hot topics right now: blogs and disasters.
It's almost enough to make my quite cheery - only that all cheer goes out of me when I am reminded of the misery which created this unique media situation. Still: the least we can do is to learn as much as possible from disasters. Media studies can't keep people from being killed by tsunamis, but it may teach us abit about how to communicate and relate better, locally and globally.
Thursday, January 06, 2005
- college and university ranking
- the quality reform
you should read Sven Erik Skarsbø's open letter to Terje Osmundsen (pdf) about the weekly magazine Mandag Morgen and their ranking of Norwegian Colleges and Universities.
Sometimes it feels really good to see incompetence blatantly revealed by people who have taken their time both to find the flaws and check them. Delicious reading on a slightly disillusioned day.
Wednesday, January 05, 2005
This is both an annoying and an interesting piece. Reading like a confessional, a collection of the "why do I blog" stories that are so well known from blogs, they feel very true to the topic and the medium. At the same time the informal nature of the writing collected like this makes those pieces less interesting reading than when I read the same stuff in their blogs.
Part of my delight in reading blogs is finding a new person. By reading through the older links and the archives, I can explore and imagine a personality, a human being with a certain slant. Reading what Clancy and Dennis writes in this collection, I find myself smiling because I know the tone of their blogs, their chats, and their actual real life speaking voice.
But this makes the rest of the pieces pale in comparison. I skim through them quickly, looking for some new take on academic blogging which has not already been hashed to death, finding little substance. Eric Mason cautions adjuncts to be wary of the arrogance of writing, the false security it may create, combined with real danger. It resonates with both the written words of The Invisible Adjunct and the actions of Alex Golub - who cleaned up his blog and removed much of the material which had so delighted his readers when the time came to apply for jobs. (His new blog is nice too though, although not as much fun as it used to be.) Others, like Carlton Clark, writes about how he feels he can do his job better by blogging, as it is a good lesson for people to see that professors who teach writing 1) can write and 2) are human beings.
Common to all the posts is the personal experience and how this experience somehow weaves into the life of an academic. Academia tends to be very self-referring, hence apparently isolated from the rest of society, what non-academics like to term "the real world". Blogs open up a window into scholarly practice, research, publishing, teaching - bringing a public debate into an arena where the public can participate. It changes not the role, but the practice of the scholar, and the digressions together form a cute little collection of personal descriptions of how this happens.
Tuesday, January 04, 2005
Still, if you read Norwegian and are as curious as me (or just half as curious) about how this will work out, the links are in this post.
Monday, January 03, 2005
No wonder it bugs the journalists. Something has to be wrong. And this something needs to be the thing that distinguishes a journalists from any casual pen-wielder: journalistic methodology and ethics.
The journalists are not the only ones driving for a more formalised world of blogging. Teachers, researchers, publishers, readers, software developers: everybody want to define blogging as one thing or the other. We want standards, intent, categories and definitions. These things are some of the most important tools for measuring quality, assigning status and doing research. Of course we want them: to get credit, to perform comparative studies, to get approval.
But does the world of blogging need this? The potential of blogging is that it can be A, B, C or just about any letter of the alphabeth you know, and possibly some unknown ones too. The wonder of blogging is that a blog can be written in any style, discuss any topic, have any intent and fit into any category or none. Blogs are as individual as the people writing them.
If we make a blogger's manifesto, a code of ethics or what ever, it either needs to be very open, along the lines of "An' it harm none, do what ye will", or it will limit blogs to something other than what they are at the moment. If we do make a definition which, for instance, defines bloggers as a kind of free-form, uninstitutionalised second-rate journalists, a VERY large group of active bloggers will fall outside of the definition.
Personally I prefer the first kind of manifesto, but it doesn't matter to me if blogs become defined as only one thing. It will mean that "blogs" as we know them today will disappear, but personal publishing online will not. The people who today use blog software for their own puposes will go on doing that, or they will switch to new software which suits their purpose even better. The important change in media use which the blog signifies is not limited to a certain genre or style of publishing, but to the act of publishing itself. Blogs gave publishing power to the people. I don't think the average net writer is going to stop writing just because somebody redefine what a blog is.
- The students were in the middle of a period of very busy production
- I asked them to do two things: learn how to blog and discuss topics they had to research
- Three days is too short a time to understand what blogging is about, blogs are slow despite the instant publishing
They kept up with blogging though, and used a large group blogs as a way to stay in touch while in their internships.
This year I am setting a clear task which we will work on over a larger span of time. The topic for all of them is the disaster in South-east india. I want all of them to have the same focus, and then collect links to coverage of the disaster. I do however NOT want them to focus on what is in the papers or comes from organised sources, but to mainly look for material which comes unfiltered from common people - a lot of which will be communicated through blogs.
For new media scholars, large and dramatic events involving a lot of "normal" people, that is people whose main job is something other than communication, are fascinating cases to study. 11th of September 2001 and the war in Iraq are two events where personal publishing became important sources of information. Now the tsunami in South-East Asia becomes another case in this rather unhappy list.
I will also make one little twist from last year, and run one of the Tsunami blogs myself. I will use this to give direction to the students, provide hints and links, and organise the material they find. All of these blogs will be in Norwegian, but I'll post the links when they are up and running.
If you want to do something else: create a story, share your emotions, create a resource for links on a topic, share pictures and stories from your journeys, then by all means, do it your own way!
Just remember one thing though: This is online, it's public, if you get over-emotional and attack in a way that can be understood as slander, take Outing's advice and ask somebody before you post. Check if you say something you can be sued for. Even Norway, with the liberal practice of publishing, has laws on slander, and you may end up paying far more than you can afford.
So play nice, even if you don't need to play by the rules of the journalists unless you want to be one.
Saturday, January 01, 2005
- One article with Hilde on Neverwinter Nights. No, I haven't forgotten about it, and now I am getting a new laptop that can deal with the game, so it will be easier to get the time to play.
- One article on public information in the age of new user patterns, in Norwegian.
- One three-year plan drawn up for future research and publishing. I finally know what I want to do, but I don't have the right words in place yet - a bit more thinking while writing to do for that. But it is about blogs, games, hybrid media, participants and users.
- One article on blogs and theorization of the blogosphere - just because Bitch PhD posted an interesting call for papers and it would fit smack into the above three year plan.
- Attending (at least) two conferences, one of them DAC 2005 in Copenhagen (website to appear here soon), the other possibly in New York in May if I can fit that into a very rough spring of teaching.
- Outlining a course in "multimediated popularisation" - just because it's a fun thing I want to explore and teach, and sometimes even teachers should have fun.
If I manage this, I'll feel good about my achievements come 2006.